By Larry Malerba, DO, DHt – Most doctors and patients have some awareness of the concept of suppression as it applies to medicine – but what is it really and what impact does it have upon health?
The average person tends to describe suppression in immunologic terms; in other words, it is believed to be a type of weakening of the immune system, which can result in greater susceptibility to microbial invasion. While this is partially true, suppression needs to be understood in its much broader context.
No symptom is random, no matter how superficial or odd. We must begin with this basic understanding – each symptom has a purpose within the greater whole of the human organism. That purpose may not always be discernible, but all symptoms must be seen in the larger context as expressions of imbalance of the underlying vital life energy that animates each human being.
When the life force becomes compromised, it generates symptoms that reflect its degree of distress. Symptoms can manifest on any or all levels: physical, emotional, mental, and/or spiritual. Frequent vomiting is a more serious sign of distress than, say, a runny nose or facial pimple. A tendency to jealous rage is a more serious symptom than a flare-up of hemorrhoids.
Symptoms commonly jump from one level to another. The reason for this is that all symptoms, at bottom, are driven by the status of the underlying bioenergetic life force. The energetic focus of a condition can easily shift, for example, from migraines to anxiety and back to migraines again. Herein lies the limitation of a conventional medical understanding of health and illness, which is steeped in materialism and fails to acknowledge the energetic dynamics of human health.
A comparatively healthy life force will tend to generate more superficial, less threatening symptoms, such as sneezing, temporary sadness, or a patch of itchy skin. A more compromised life force will often generate more serious symptoms, whether they are acute symptoms, such as sudden facial paralysis or intense abdominal pain, or chronic symptoms, such as loss of interest in life or arthritic hip pain.
When we understand the above, it becomes clear why most normal healthy babies tend to get diaper rashes, stuffy noses, and fevers. In contrast, less healthy adults tend to complain of symptoms such as headaches, stiff joints, and bouts of sleeplessness. Adults with more compromised states of health tend to develop high blood pressure, chronic fatigue, and mood disorders like depression and anxiety.
Is illness simply a function of getting older or is there more to it? After all, not all people become burdened with serious chronic illness as they grow older. There are plenty of relatively happy, healthy adults out there who lead active, creative, productive lives. Nevertheless, there is a rapidly rising incidence of chronic illness that is affecting not only older people but young people too. This trend, in my opinion, is a direct consequence of the rise of the pharmaceutical industry. A conventional medical colleague once told me that he could guesstimate the number of pharmaceuticals that his patients were taking based upon their age. Patients in their forties took four drugs, patients in their fifties took five drugs, and so on.
What accounts for the difference between healthy adults and chronically ill adults, or healthy and not so healthy kids for that matter? The answer requires that we return to the phenomenon of suppression. The long-term trajectory of one’s health lies largely in the way that each given individual handles symptoms and illness. When suppressive measures are employed, the long-term outcome is much more likely to be chronic illness. When the methods used respect the intent of symptoms and work with the vital energy, rather than against it, the outcomes tend to be more favorable.
Here is a comparative example that illustrates the effects of suppression:
Jack and Jill were healthy children. Their only medical issues were patches of eczema on the elbow creases of each child. Jack’s parents applied topical cortisone cream just a few times until the eczema vanished, never to return. Jill’s parents used alternating applications of calendula and chamomile creams with a moderate degree of success. At times her eczema would fade and at other times it would resurface, but it remained generally tolerable over the course of several years.
Within a couple weeks of the disappearance of Jack’s eczema, he developed an ear infection. It was successfully treated with an antibiotic, but Jack developed five more ear infections over the course of the following year, and each was treated with another round of antibiotics. During this time, Jack’s demeanor became more grumpy and whiny and he became pickier about the foods he would eat. Meanwhile, while Jill still had a touch of eczema that fluctuated over the months, the only other problem that she had was one minor head cold, which was treated with a combination of vitamin C and honey lemon tea.
By the age of five, Jack ceased to have ear infections, but they were replaced by annual bouts of bronchitis that could last for weeks, and these were also treated with rounds of antibiotics. Jack was also given an inhaler when his pediatrician detected some wheezing during a couple of his bouts with bronchitis. Over time he began to complain of stomachaches, and he remained finicky about his food choices. His dietary staples had been reduced to hotdogs, chicken fingers, pasta, and cheese sticks. Jill, on the other hand, continued to be generally healthy with just an occasional cold and a recurring touch of eczema.
At the beginning of his middle school years, Jack showed signs of having greater difficulty. He stayed home some days complaining of stomach pain but his parents suspected that this was also partially due to his inability to complete some of his homework assignments. His doctor prescribed a couple of acid reflux drugs, to no avail. He was now taking daily doses of medication to prevent asthma but he continued to miss school days with respiratory illnesses especially in the winters. Jill adjusted to middle school comparatively well. Her parents brought her to a homeopathic practitioner to see if anything could be done for her eczema. To their surprise, the eczema seemed to vanish completely after a few months of treatment during which time she seemed to blossom into a socially active and academically successful teenage girl.
Frustrated with Jack’s lack of overall progress both health-wise and academically, his parents sought help from the pediatrician who suggested a trial treatment with an antidepressant. Jack seemed to improve for a few months but thereafter took a dramatic turn for the worse. He began acting out in school, failed to turn in assignments, and wound up in detention several times. His doctor changed his prescription to an attention deficit medication. Meanwhile, Jill continued to thrive in school with little difficulty and almost no health problems.
By now, I hope you are beginning to see a very clear trend. I could go on until Jack turns fifty years old with heart disease and diabetes, but I won’t belabor the point. The more important point is that this type of scenario is increasingly common.
Long-term health is almost a direct function of the way in which symptoms and illnesses are handled. The outcomes, in terms of who remains healthy and whose health deteriorates over time, are not at all random. Suppressive treatments often result in very poor long-term outcomes. When we consider that almost all drug therapies are fundamentally suppressive, the implications for our collective health are staggering.
All symptoms represent the human organism’s best efforts to heal itself. The vast majority of the time, this self-healing mechanism works just fine without outside intervention – most conditions resolve on their own after their purposes have been served. But sometimes symptoms are too intense, or dangerous, or remain unresolved. This is when outside assistance becomes desirable. While very threatening symptoms may necessitate temporary suppressive measures, most illnesses do not fall into this category. Nevertheless, conventional medicine, by default, opts for a suppressive approach in almost all cases.
A shortsighted approach seeks to suppress the immediate symptoms without regard for the context in which they are occurring or without concern for the greater whole. Put another way: a painkiller may dull a headache but it is not necessarily good for you. Tylenol may lower a fever but it is not necessarily in the best interest of overall health. And cortisone may make eczema disappear but it is definitely not good for long-term health.
Suppression drives illness deeper into the system, thus causing it to mutate into more serious conditions. The life force manifests its distress in the most favorable way possible, given the parameters of each situation. A strong life force will focus its energy toward the periphery, thus generating relatively superficial symptoms such as a simple skin eruption or a runny nose. As the life force weakens and becomes compromised, illnesses manifest on deeper levels.
There is a general hierarchical relationship in terms of the way symptoms manifest in the human organism – and it proceeds roughly in this direction: body > heart > mind > spirit. Therefore, when a physical illness is prevented from occurring, usually by means of suppressive medications, the life force seeks to express the disturbance in another location. There is a tendency for the disturbance to eventually “metastasize” to another, deeper level. When it is forced away from the physical level, the energetic disturbance often resurfaces on the emotional or mental levels. Since conventional medicine does not acknowledge this phenomenon, it never owns up to the role it plays in generating mental, emotional, and spiritual illness.
So, how do we know if a treatment is suppressive or not? The answer lies in the longer-term direction that one’s overall health takes over time. Is overall health generally improving or declining? Note that this is very different from asking whether the eczema or headaches are improving over time. If a child with successfully treated eczema ultimately winds up with migraines, it is likely that suppressive treatments contributed to this outcome. If strong painkillers are then used to suppress the migraines to the point that they cease to recur, but the child then develops depression, it is almost certain that suppression led to an overall decline of health.
True healing works in a direction opposite to suppression. If a method that respects the body’s innate healing capacity is employed, we might expect that as the depression recedes, the migraines may temporarily resurface. And as the migraines recede, the eczema may erupt once again. While suppression concerns itself with eradicating the symptom at hand without regard for the whole, any truly effective healing method is always cognizant of the greater whole and longer term overall direction of a person’s health status. Most green holistic healing modalities respect the wisdom of the body, seek to work with symptoms of illness rather than against them, and contribute to positive long-term outcomes.
Image Credit: © Nevit Dilmen [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) or GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons
Larry Malerba, DO, DHt is a physician and educator whose mission is to build bridges between holistic healing, conventional medicine, and spirituality. He is the author of Metaphysics & Medicine: Restoring Freedom of Thought to the Art and Science of Healing and Green Medicine: Challenging the Assumptions of Conventional Health Care. He writes for Huffington Post, Natural News, and the American Holistic Medical Association. Dr. Malerba is board certified in Homeotherapeutics, is Clinical Assistant Professor at New York Medical College, and past president of the Homeopathic Medical Society of the State of New York. He is a dual citizen of the U.S. and Ireland. Website: SpiritScienceHealing.com